Frequent question: Could a balanced ecosystem exist without decomposers?

Could a balanced ecosystem exist without Decomposer explain?

An ecosystem could exist with only producers and decomposers but a balanced ecosystem could not exist with only producers and decomposers and no consumers. If there would be no consumers, plants will overgrow and will fight for the limited nutrients available.

What would happen to an ecosystem if all the decomposers were removed?

If decomposers were removed from a food chain, there would be a break down in the flow of matter and energy. Waste and dead organisms would pile up. Producers would not have enough nutrients because, within the waste and dead organisms, nutrients would not be released back into the ecosystem.

Can an ecosystem function without consumer?

Without the primary consumers there would be no source of energy for carnivores or secondary consumers so no secondary consumers would exist in that ecosystem. … The producers would be the only organisms in the ecosystem, besides decomposers. The producers would likely over reproduce.

IT IS INTERESTING:  Question: How does environmental policy relate to federalism?

What would happen to an ecosystem if all it’s decomposers and detritus feeders were eliminated?

1 Approved Answer Answer a) If Decomposers and detritus feeders eliminated, Then Wastes and the remains of dead organisms would pile up and the nutrients within the waste and dead organisms would not be released back into the ecosystem.

Could you construct a balanced ecosystem that contained only producers and consumers?

Could a balanced ecosystem contain producers and consumers but no decomposers? … Yes, producers are all that is needed for a balanced ecosystem.

What would happen if there was an absence of decomposers in an ecosystem give two examples of decomposers?

In the absence of decomposers, the dead bodies of plants and animals would keep lying as such and the elements of plant and animal bodies would never be returned to their original pool like soil, air and water.

What would happen without any decomposers in this cycle?

Imagine what would happen if there were no decomposers. Wastes and the remains of dead organisms would pile up and the nutrients within the waste and dead organisms would not be released back into the ecosystem. Producers would not have enough nutrients. … Essentially, many organisms could not exist.

Which of the following best explains what would happen if there were no decomposers in an ecosystem?

What would happen if there were no decomposers? Decomposers keep dead matter from “piling up” and restore nutrients to the ecosystem. If there were no decomposers, some plants might die due to a shortage of important nutrients. … Some organisms could die, some could survive, and some could move to a new location.

IT IS INTERESTING:  What are environmental engineers responsibilities?

What will happen if there are no producers and no decomposers in the ecosystem?

The other dependent animals or trophic level will not survive without food. Without plants and animals decomposers will die and there will be no life on earth. So, if there were no producers, the food chain would not initiate and all the living species on earth would die.